Sunday, December 7, 2008

Green Washing

It's Not Easy Being Green

By William Cooley, Elisha Maldonado,
Kriti Ashok, and Dan Lu


It isn’t easy being green. Or defining it for that matter.

As businesses have increasingly sought to portray their products as environmentally friendly, the term “green” has quickly become a buzzword in advertising and marketing campaigns.


What companies and consumers have discovered is a largely subjective and sometimes misleading language designed to attract well-intentioned buyers into buying products that are. For consumers, companies and environmental organizations, the notion of “going green” can have greatly different meanings.

Consumer Confusion
Despite the onslaught of ads touting “green,” “recycled” and “environmentally friendly” products, research indicates that many consumers are unaware of what “green” really means.


A survey conducted earlier this year by the Shelton Group, a
Tennessee advertising agency, revealed that many consumers feel great confusion when it comes to environmental issues and rarely buy with the environment in mind.

Although 49 percent of those surveyed said a company’s “environmental record has influenced” their buying decisions, only 21 percent said it had led them to chose one product over another.

“People are interested in being green,” company CEO Suzanne Shelton told Brand Week magazine, “but they don't necessarily know what to do specifically. When people are confused, they do nothing.”

Another question asked participants to define the characteristics of a “green” home. Forty-two percent said they didn’t know, 28 percent said solar power, 12 percent said compact fluorescent lights and 10 percent said energy efficient appliances.

In addition to highlighting the confusion felt by many consumers, the survey also found that when it came to actual buying decisions, most consumers place their needs ahead of the environment.

The survey asked, “Given a choice between your comfort, your convenience or the environment, which do you most often choose?” Thirty-one percent said they chose the environment, while 46 percent chose comfort.

While the Shelton Group’s survey indicates a serious disconnect between consumer attitudes and behavior, other data supports the notion that buyers are, at the very least, interested in a company’s environmental record.

According to a report released by the Natural Marketing Institute in September, consumers would like greater corporate transparency when it comes to the environment.

The survey presented respondents with ten areas of focus. Each area was preceded with the phrase: “Are you interested in learning about what companies are doing to…”

Sixty-two percent of respondents are interested in recycling, 60 percent in waste reduction, 59 percent in pollution reduction, 56 percent in reduced energy consumption and 47 percent in the use of renewable energy.

Although it may not directly impact consumers’ buying decisions, many companies are taking notice and making a greater effort to publicize their environmental records.


'The Green Thumbs of Silicon Valley Companies'

By Kriti Ashok & Dan Lu


The green wave has especially gripped the Silicon Valley. From software giants to minnows, all are doing their bit for a healthy environment. While paper-plastic recycling and carpooling have become all-pervasive behaviors, some of the hi-tech honchos have taken the next big step. IBM started programs to reduce employee commuting and has sustained them for nearly two decades. Two key contributors to this effort are IBM's work-at-home program, which allows employees' "work" office to be in their homes, and IBM's mobile employees program, which enables employees to work from home a designated number of days each week.


These important aspects of IBM's work/life balance programs help its employees better balance their personal and work responsibilities. They also benefit the environment. “I can work from home and take care of my two-year-old daughter when my wife leaves for her office” said Sumit Ranjan, senior software engineer at IBM. “I report to my manager who supervises me from Los Angeles.” Ranjan lives with his family in Santa Clara.


IBM's work-at-home program conserved approximately 7.75 million gallons of fuel and avoided more than 64,000 metric tons of CO2 emissions in 2007 in the U.S. alone.


Intel distributed coffee mugs to all its employees this September to eradicate the use of paper utensils in break-rooms. “It’s such a relief every time I sip coffee from my mug. We are also provided with preferred parking lots for using car-pools” said Juhi Mohan, product development engineer at Intel. “All the lights are turned off at 9 pm during weekdays which I think saves a lot of energy.” With a purchase of 1.3 billion kilo watt hours of renewable energy, Intel tops Environmental Protection Agency’s Green Power Partner List.


Oracle has tried to achieve a paperless system with Oracle Advanced Compression. A unique program that does storage virtualization consolidation and uses fewer plastic disks thus consuming much less power. Also, Oracle has been promoting programs for the protection and perpetuation of wildlife. Committed to causes like The Bald Eagle Recovery Project, Dian Fossey Gorrila Fund International and The Nature Conservancy, it has touched its employees’ personal lives too. Satish Kumar, a software engineer at Oracle said, “Oracle's food service provider donates all unused food to Turning Point Women's Shelter in Redwood City. If Turning Point cannot take all the food available, a donation is made to the Santa Clara Second Harvest Food Bank.”


Cisco has taken a few leaps further by implementing water-less urinals and motion-sensored on/off switches for lights and air-conditioning in conference rooms. Mayank Bhatnagar, the project lead in support and maintenance department of Cisco said, “Internal sharing for reusing electronic equipments has dramatically reduced e-waste in the office and it is one of the most significant steps.”


OSI Soft’s San Leandro office is a “smart building” with computer-enabled motion activated lighting and ventilation. Sunil Suram, Quality Assurance Engineer at OSI Soft said, “We have eliminated any chance of unnecessary energy consumption. All the systems are turned off when no one’s around.”

Another company has been making an effort to keep the environment free of waste and pollution. Linear Technology in Milpitas was recently audited for Environmental Management System and its effort to keep the environment clean. On their website regarding audits,

it states, “We strive to conduct annual Safety and Environmental audits at each of our manufacturing facilities. We promptly implement any necessary corrective actions.”


Joe Riquelme, a product engineer for the Milpitas high-tech firm which designs and manufactures integrated circuits for all electronic products, was able to summarize some of the things the company does to keep our region clean. “We conduct our operations in a manner that reduces pollution and maintains protection of the environment. We strive to reduce and eliminate wastes,” said Riquelme.


Some of the objectives for Linear Technology’s office include reducing paper usage by 5 percent, recycle toner and ink cartridges, reducing energy use at lighting fixtures, eliminate Styrofoam use in the cafeteria and coffee stations.


On the manufacturing of their products, the company has a long list of things they do to reduce waste and pollution. Linear Technology has increased the volume of lead-free products, increased recycling of PVC tubes and aluminum canisters, reduce water use at air scrubbers, eliminate antimony and bromine in packaging fire retardants, improve offsite waste disposal site selection, evaluate environmental aspects and impacts from significant L.T.C. Projects (i.e. Construction).


At another Silicon Valley company, Yes Video in Santa Clara, also does its part in being environmentally friendly. Yes Video does media-to-DVD transfer services from the private consumer level all the way up to corporate archiving, legal archiving, and government archiving.


Customer Service Rep. Jon Mendez said, “Our company consumes a lot of paper and plastic goods as well as several thousand DVD discs a week. The waste we accumulate is usually plastic and cardboard and we take great measures that everything is disposed of properly - calling different types of waste and recycling companies to pick up the cardboard, the plastic, and hundreds of discarded DVD media.”

The company continues its quest in being green by doing a large amount of hardware recycling. Batteries, DVD burner towers, server towers, multimedia decks, printers, and computer hardware are the many things the company recycles along with making sure that different waste management companies pick up the company’s waste as well. In terms of electricity, the Santa Clara company has reduced light usage over the past several years; only at night will certain departments utilize full illumination.


Every measure to stay environmentally friendly has been carefully evaluated by each department head at Yes Video, including Mendez, and the various executive staff members. If a new method of being environmentally sound is available to the company, they plan to make every effort to incorporate it into the company's daily procedure.


Back at Linear Technology, Riquelme states that when Linear’s products are produced with the environment in mind, they are, “More expensive, but more customers are demanding green products which in turn increases our sales.” What he learns from his company, he does in his own home, which is recycling cans, paper, and bottles. “We need to preserve what's left of our ozone layer, clean air, plants and animals to ensure the quality of our future generations' lives,” said Riquelme. At Yes Video, a cost efficiency evaluation of their company’s procedures with environmentally friendly methods has shown there has been no adverse fiscal impact to the company or the services they provide said Mendez.


In the Mendez household, to stay environmentally friendly, his family would limit the use of the heater as well as careful management of light usage in the house. All of the light bulbs have been replaced with energy efficient bulbs. Biodegradable food is recycled into compost which is used in their home gardens. Old hardware is donated to recycling and waste management companies and he does the standard recycling of paper and plastic products.

Mendez concludes by saying, “Consumption of our planetary resources is extremely limited. Large companies should be at the forefront of environmental impact awareness and therefore should also be taking greater measures to make sure our resources are used wisely and efficiently.”


(Note, Some Names Have Been Changed)


Activist Angst
Despite the efforts of many companies in Silicon Valley to “go green,” according to environmental activists, the largest producers of consumer electronics have a long way to go.

Since 2006, Greenpeace has published the “Guide to Greener Electronics,” a survey and critique of electronics producers based on environmental responsibility.

The guide’s 10th edition was published in November and ranks companies based on their use of toxic chemicals, attempts to reduce energy consumption and efforts to handle E-waste generated by the companies’ products.

Although many companies have seen an improvement in ranking over the past two years, results are largely negative.

Nokia has regularly topped the list. In the guide’s 10th edition, the company pulled in a 6.9/10 based on Greenpeace’s criteria.

Runners up include Sony, FSC, Samsung and Sony Ericsson, which all receive scores between 5 and 6.

For complete information, download the guide here: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/guide-greener-electronics-november-241108



Green Washing Slide Show:
(Click link to view)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/25265322@N03/sets/72157610809688761/show/

Students were asked two questions and here are their video responses:
Questions:
1. What do you think are the necessary criteria a company should fulfill before it calls its products GREEN?

2.
Would you go ahead and buy something GREEN/Eco friendly/ Environmentally healthy even if its expensive?

Video #1 - Dipti Khasnis, Sem I, Civil Engineering



Video #2 - Dipti Khasnis, Sem I, Civil Engineering




Video #3 - Chanell Williams, Sophomore, Chemistry



Video #4 - Chanell Williams, Sophomore, Chemistry



Video #5 - Jasmine, Senior, Sociology




Sidebar:
'Opposing Views on Green Living'
By Elisha Maldonado

She may not have a green thumb, she says, but she certainly has a green mind.
Lisa McKay, a SJSU alumni and mother of two, says she voraciously recycles everything. Her children help by matching the item to the special bin she made just for them: paper goes in the paper bin. Plastics go in the plastics bin. Glass -- though she mainly handles this one -- goes in the glass bin.

It is almost impossible to miss McKay's "recycling center," the fluorescent bins lining the wall are in your face.

But McKay does more than just recycle. She always brings her own canvas bags to the supermarket. She unplugs any electronic device from the home outlets unless they are in use. She and her family don't watch television. And walks with the children involve lessons on not littering and cleaning up one's environment.

"I want to live a green lifestyle for my children," McKay said. "I want them to be able to enjoy the world I grew up in. Actually, I want them to have a better one."
Although her children are her main point in going green, McKay says she does it because she has “a great love for the world I inhabit.

“I don’t want to witness, firsthand, its destruction.”

McKay, however, isn't the only one trying to change her thinking and lifestyle. In a new nationwide Harris Poll, 2,602 U.S. adults were interviewed, between May 5 and 12, on the environment and their thoughts on playing a part.

The results found that women, like McKay, are much more likely than men to believe their actions are significant, the poll says, by a 77 percent margin to 67 percent.
But not everyone is doing something to change his or her lifestyles, the poll states. The primary reason is that people don't know what to do, it furthered. But, that isn't always the case, especially for Jill Howard, a senior at SJSU.

Howard says she isn't green, and doesn't plan on being green, as long as people tell her to do it.

"I think that every time someone tells me I need to be more green, I feel obligated to throw something on the ground and litter, leave all the lights on and drive a suburban," Howard says. "It's not even a green movement anymore, it’s a religion."

Though Howard says she thinks she would probably do it, because she is "all for being responsible," she can't stand all of the people making it a "moral issue."
"I would rather do it because I wanted to, rather than by moral compulsion. It is like a secular version of going to Sunday school."


Sidebar: 'Recycle, Reduce, Reuse' By Dan Lu

1. First step - Recycle

After reading the stories about green washing and green companies, you are probably wondering what can you do to help out the environment. The first thing you can do is to recycle aluminum cans, plastic bottles, clear shampoo bottles, cardboard and paper. Many recycling centers offer cash for these items. A check of the 'Bottlesandcans' website (www.bottlesandcans.com), lists six recycling centers near the San Jose State campus (95192).







Ranch Town Recycling Center Inc
775 Lincoln Ave
San Jose CA 95126
(408) 292-3333
1.10 miles

NexCycle/Safeway #1483
1530 Hamilton Ave
San Jose CA 95125
(909) 796-2210
1.40 miles

NexCycle/Safeway #3108
1305 S Winchester Blvd
San Jose CA 95128
(909) 796-2210
1.87 miles

San Jose Metal Inc
1032 N 10th St
San Jose CA 95112
(408) 293-4032
2.19 miles

TOMRA Pacific Inc
1303 Story Rd
San Jose CA 95112
(408) 293-9817
2.19 miles

Tung Tai Group

1726 Rogers Ave
San Jose CA 95112
(408) 573-8661
2.19 miles

Also on the same website, you can use their California Refund Value calculator to see how much you would get back for your recyclables. If you had 100 CRV aluminum cans and 100 PET plastic bottles, you would get back $5.29 for the aluminum cans and $6.50 for the PET plastic bottles, with a total of $11.79 for your stash.

CRV calculator: http://www.bottlesandcans.com/dev/calculator.cfm

2. Second step - Reduce

Silicon Valley companies have taken a step in reducing waste, pollution, and energy as stated above. Consumers and SJSU students can do their own part in reducing waste, pollutants, and energy as well.

1. SJSU students can skip their automobiles and use the VTA pass which comes with their tuition. Riding public transportation will reduce vehicles on the roads, reduce emissions, reduce our dependcy on gas and oil, and reduce traffic.

2. Some of the Silicon Valley companies stated they turn off the lights at a certain time. Do your part by turning off unneccessary lights and appliances when not in use. It reduces energy usage and reduces your energy costs.

3. Reduce your waste by using your biodegradable leftovers such as produce and bread as compost for your garden. Or you can place recycling bins in your backyard and sort out junk mail, cans, and bottles for recycling. It reduces the waste you produce and reduces the amount of trash in our landfills.

3. Third step - Reuse

The Conservatory of Flowers in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park has a special exhibit going on from now till April 19, 2009. The Golden Gate Express is a unique exhibit which incorporates model trains and famous San Francisco landmarks. But the catch is, the landmarks are completely made out of recycled, reclaimed, and reusable materials.

The Transamerica Pyramid which is a downtown San Francisco landmark stands 853-feet tall. However, pictured left is the model version which is made completely out of 600 computer keyboard keys, 30 floppy disks, and other keyboard parts.

From the Conservatory of Flowers' website:
"The artists of San Francisco's Figureplant, a leading prop and model making company in San Francisco, have taken a very creative approach to fabricating the scaled down landmark buildings."

http://www.conservatoryofflowers.org/insidetheconservatory/special.htm

Ultimately, the special exhibit takes a look at a unique approach how consumers can reuse some of their waste and make it into something everyone can appreciate. One man's trash is another person's treasure.


Note: Click on any pictures in any story to enlarge















Below are some extra links for more information about green washing and to help you get started on recycling, reducing, and reusing:


http://www.recyclestuff.org

Fortune Magazine – 10 Green Giants (Companies that implement “Green” measures)

http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0703/gallery.green_giants.fortune/index.html


2008 Guide to Greener Electronics

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/press-center/reports4/guide-to-greener-electronics-9



http://www.greenwashingindex.com/


FTC Guidelines for “Green” Products

In an effort to help consumers better understand “green” advertisements, the Federal Trade Commission has produced a fact sheet defining the following terms and concepts as they relate to advertising.


“Recycled” – Items bearing this title must be made of post-consumer waste removed from the standard “waste stream.” These include products produced from paper, plastic and metal that has undergone a recycling process.


“Recycled Parts” – Any item that includes “used, rebuilt, reconditioned, or remanufactured parts” must say so on the item itself. Failing to include this information constitutes false advertising, especially if the item contains used mechanical parts.


“Less Waste” – Products advertising that they use less waste or contain less of a particular item, such as plastic, must be clear and explain how much is being reduced. If the plastic use is 15 percent less, it should say “15 percent less.”


“Non-Toxic” – Products advertised as such must be free from toxic chemicals and reasonably safe for the environment. Although this does not mean materials must be biodegradable, it prohibits any chemical that would do harm to the environment if introduced.


“Eco-Friendly” – According to the FTC this means that a product has little or no impact on the environment. It should not be toxic, lead to water or air pollution, or be harmful to animals.


Download the complete guidelines here: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/general/gen02.pdf


Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Porn filters: The battle of protection vs. free speech in local, national libraries

Porn filters: The battle of protection vs. free speech in local, national libraries

By Chris Bausinger, Jason Le Miere, Dominique Dumadaug, and Dan Lu

The Internet is hailed as the last true bastion of free speech, but how free should it be in a public place where individuals and the innocent eyes of children watching?

This is the essence of the debate over whether pornography filters should be installed on the computer systems of public libraries.

Porn filter advocates say they are a must as children need to be protected from seeing illicit material on the Web, as well as to prevent unscrupulous users from viewing such material and engaging in public acts of profanity.

The other side of the debate is that porn filters not only infringe on an individual’s right to freely view any desired material, but that filters will unintentionally block non-harmful sites, particularly those containing health information.

The issue gained notoriety in San Jose over the past year as council member Pete Constant attempted to get the San Jose City Council to vote to install pornography filters in all of the city’s public libraries.

Constant’s argument, according to the San Jose Mercury News, was that men were using libraries to view explicit material and then exposing themselves.

In a December 2007 interview with Constant, he said he became interested in the topic when he saw a November 2006 TV report by ABC Channel 7 News correspondent Dan Noyes, who brought the issue out into the light.

At the time, this was countered by San Jose Library Director Jane Light who said that only 12 arrests were made for computer related sex offenses during the 2006-07 budget year, according to the San Jose Mercury News.

In a February 2006 article in the Spartan Daily, University Library Dean Ruth Kifer countered Constant’s concerns by saying "the library does not have a significant problem with pornography and inappropriate behavior," Kifer said, "The vast majority of our library users utilize the computers to access digital information resources in a responsible manner."
Current SJSU librarian Paul Kauppila said that he believes most librarians to be against the installation of filters.

“It's simply not possible at this point to develop any sort of filter technology that does not also block many forms of legally protected speech,” Kauppila said.
Despite this view, filters are in use at half of the country’s libraries.

Even though the librarians have shown their dislike for using filters in their libraries, some patrons feel differently about what goes on inside the library.

In a random polling at Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Library, 14 of 35 people polled thought that the viewing of pornographic material was a problem inside the library. Of those 14, eight said they witnessed a library visitor viewing the material on a library terminal.

While age was not a question in the polling, yes-responding participants generally were older and parents, which is a key point for Constant in his proposals to the City Council. In the interview with Constant he said, “My biggest group of supporters are parents,” also adding that, “The city should not be paying for people to view porn.”
Constant is not alone in his beliefs and has the support of not just parents, but SJSU students as well.

“The library is a place for studying,” Samantha Nitta, a junior public relations and Japanese double major said, “and you should not be able to go to the library to look at content like this. If people are going to do that, they need to do it in the privacy in their own home.”


Library Poll: "Do you think that the viewing of sexual material in the library is a problem?" (Click graphic to enlarge)

Of those answering "Yes,"
8 said they have witnessed people viewing pornographic material on the library terminals

3 said they have witnessed people viewing pornographic material on their laptops

2 said they have witnessed people viewing pornographic material but were unsure of the medium used.

Of those answering "No,"
10 said they thought that filters would help prevent pornographic material from being viewed by other library patrons.

1 said they thought that filters would not help prevent pornographic material from being viewed by other library patrons.

Of those answering "Not enough information,"
5 said that filters would be a good idea for the library to help reduce incidents of "lewd acts"

3 said that filters would not be a good idea and would create problems for issues of free speech.

1 said that the use of library filters is unnecessary.

1 said that filters should be used to prevent children from viewing pornographic or violent images.

1 said that filters would prevent students and curious teens from doing research of a sexual nature.


"Users are responsible for determining that the information they access is acceptable, reliable and suitable to their needs...In doing so, the Library does not monitor and has no control over the information accessed through the Internet and assumes no responsibility for its content."

For the full internet access and use policy of San Jose Libraries, go to:

http://sjlibrary.org/legal/policies.htm?pID=310








Slide show of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Library and filter story pictures:
(Click link to view)


http://www.flickr.com/photos/25265322@N03/sets/72157608972214320/show/


Sidebar:

Porn Nation Poster

Porn Nation: What is porn? Who decides what is pornographic and what to ban in libraries?

Michael Leahy can freely admit now that he had a problem.

“As a guy who had an affinity for porn, I became an early adopter of everything that came out.”

Leahy, the author of Porn Nation, used to work for the tech industry. When the Internet came out, it became even easier for him to obtain pornography and further fuel his addiction.

“A common definition of porn is this,” said Leahy, “Any material designed with the purpose of arousing you sexually.”

Leahy grabbed that definition from Webster’s Dictionary.

Yet, the Cambridge University Press Dictionary defines pornography as: “books, magazines, films, etc. with no artistic value which describe or show sexual acts or naked people in a way that is intended to be sexually exciting but would be considered unpleasant or offensive to many people.”

So which definition is right?

“As an art major who has actually had to check out books from the library containing art with nudity, I have to find a line between what is art and what is designed to stimulate or arouse the viewer,” said sophomore and Campus Crusade for Christ member Ryan Geery. “I don’t believe nudity to fall into the category of porn necessarily.”

Playboy founder Hugh Hefner would probably agree with Geery, as he believes the pictures in his magazines are art and not pornographic as many of his opponents claim.

Who decides what is considered pornographic and should be banned from libraries when dictionary companies can’t even agree on a definition?

“City Council had a meeting several months ago in which I attended to support the position of some form of porn filters, said Geery. “Obviously, you want to be careful not to block everything, such as medical files with some nudity in it.”

Different people do have different opinions of what can be considered porn; some people do believe anything with nudity or a hint of sexual nature in it is considered pornographic.

In Leahy’s Porn Nation presentation, images of sexuality from popular television shows and movies and of pop stars were blended into the same category as pornographic movies and websites and its stars because of the “common definition” of what is porn.

“My idea is that porn filters should block pre-determined sites based on my definition of pornography, not necessarily content,” said Geery. “The human body is not bad thing, only in the context of lewd, sexual acts, so I don’t believe that content filtering is necessarily the way to go.”

The debate will go on for as long as people will keep disagreeing on what is considered pornographic.

Questions or comments, contact us:

Chris.Bausinger@gmail.com
D_dumadaug@yahoo.com
Jason_Lemiere@hotmail.com
Rollwithdan@hotmail.com

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

The 88

Living High at The 88

By Elisha Maldonado, Dan Lu, and Krystyna Coria



Soaring above the flatland of downtown San Jose stands a new edifice, its 22 floors threatening to transform downtown into an urban delight.


The 88, a residential tower offering 200 units, can be found in the heart of downtown. Ironically --- or not --- The 88 sits on 88 E. San Fernando Street, surrounded by kitschy boutiques, book stores, restaurants, you name it.


The tower is scheduled for a Spring 2008 completion, according to a release by spokesman Ron Heckmann.


Standing at a little under 88 meters in height, “The 88 will be the tallest residential building between San Francisco and Los Angeles,” according to the document.


Heckmann said the concept of building The 88 was developed a couple of years ago “with an eye toward meeting the long-term, rising demand for housing in Silicon Valley and, in particular, downtown.


“The current market conditions are challenging, but people are still buying homes, and The 88 is a truly high-quality home with a new type of lock-and-go, no-hassle lifestyle – with incredible views,” Heckmann said.


The 88 offers 197 luxury homes including 18 penthouses, with prices ranging from the low $400,000s to $4 million.

Ergo, the residential tower most likely will not be attracting students from the nearby San Jose State University.


The 88, Heckmann said, is particularly a target for single and couples who maintain busy lifestyles, but also “empty nesters and people with small families.”

The 88’s development team has a planned second, south tower that will offer 204 units.


Applicants have been a majority of upper class, middle-aged folks between their 30s and 40s. In addition, none were currently attending San Jose State University but some were SJSU alumnis said sales agent Yvonne Gottwals. The majority of the applicants have been white males and females while only about 8 percent were minorities. Some applicants were looking into buying and renting out the condos to invest in the property. Gottwals enjoys giving tours and she also has a place at The 88.


Gottwals currently lives on the eighth floor of The 88 and absolutely loves living there, because its so close to everything downtown and never has to drive anywhere, she said. She did say that all residents of The 88 are happy and have nothing but positive things to say about the lofts.



What’s around The 88? (Sidebar)

Towering 22 stories high, stands a black and white building that one might call “sexy and glamorous.” The 88 high-rise residential tower is scheduled to add at least 200 new units and downtown residents to the city of almost one million people. Located on 88 E. San Fernando Street in downtown San Jose, The 88 is within walking distance of numerous arts, entertainment, restaurants, services, shopping, parks and much more. Walkscore.com rated The 88 with a walking score of 95 out of 100 thanks to its proximity to many things within its 8.8 mile radius.

Venues nearby The 88 provide endless amounts of entertainment from sporting events, concerts, conventions, to even the circus. With the recent addition of The 88, other high-rise residential towers have sprung up resulting in a steady flurry of little boutiques, trendy frozen yogurt shops, and new restaurants to serve the new crop of residents moving in. With nearby hotels, mixed-use buildings and condos, and San Jose State’s Campus Village; urban living is not new to San Jose but construction on surrounding high-rise residences is becoming more evident throughout the downtown.

For entertainment, walk south towards Interstate 280 and residents will find one of three cinemas playing independent and the latest movies. To the north of the tower off Second Street, laughter omits from San Jose’s Improv comedy club conjuring up chuckles weekly. Late night party goers have an array of nightclubs and bar offerings within walking distance saving residents from driving around and dealing with parking.

Performance theaters are a plenty with the San Jose Repertory Theater a couple hundred feet away to museums such as the San Jose Museum of Art or the Tech Museum. When it comes to food, there are more then 150 food and dining options with plenty just across the street from The 88 such as P.F. Chang’s, E&O Trading Company, and Fahrenheit Lounge.

Although there is plenty of restaurants to serve residents, downtown is missing a mainstream supermarket ever since Albertson’s shut its doors a few years ago. Two planned grocery stores are set to open in downtown sometime in 2009. One being an upscale Whole Foods market off The Alameda near the HP Pavilion and the other being the Pleasanton based Safeway which plans to open in the 23,620-square-foot space located at the bottom of The 88. The 88’s Safeway is said to be smaller in size but upscale and niche.

In addition to the current 22-story structure, developers of The 88 are planning to construct another high-rise residential tower in its second phase in the next few years. The second tower would be constructed next door where a city parking lot now sits. With local media coverage the past few months focused on The 88, there is plenty of buzz surrounding the 22-story structure across Bay Area media and beyond.

A current map of an 8.8 mile radius of The 88 and its surroundings:

(click to enlarge)



Downtown stats:
Food and dining 154
Arts and entertainment 262
Services 119

Slide show of The 88 and surrounding areas:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/25265322@N03/sets/72157608294213559/show/


Video of The 88